ASC - Shipyard Price Vote

With a 14 for and 2 against, we have a strong affirmation for presenting this to the UNCA. Once the T2 poll is closed, I will make a formal proposal to the UNCA with this and the T2 items, if they pass. If they do not, I will simply present this.

Thanks for all who participated. No one claimed their Senator additional vote, which makes the math much easier.

I feel that there was a strong affirmation and I will pass this on. I also value those who opposed because that helps us have balanced, healthy discussions and processing. I ask their support for the voice of the community and if you are really against this. Please support the rest of the community if you feel you can not support this poll. The functioning of the community is much more important than any one vote.

No one claimed their Senator additional vote, which makes the math much easier.

That migth be because of this:

The poll will run for 7 days. Any Senator can add one extra vote after the poll closes by openly declaring their support or lack of support to this topic in this thread.

Or did you mean that senators should write a post during the time the poll is open, and then you add it after it closes? I am confused again
Doesnt matter for me for this voting, as I am not strongly for or against this, but would like to know for future voting.
Other than that well done running this in ASC RAM.

I do support increasing, but not to fond of the increased jump between cl5 and 6, which is why I ended up with a no for this voting.

Or did you mean that senators should write a post during the time the poll is open, and then you add it after it closes? I am confused again

Most likely because I did not spell it out well enough. A Senator needs to declare in poll thread BEFORE the end of the poll closing. It would be too hard if it was after because when do I stop counting to take the final vote?

I do support increasing, but not to fond of the increased jump between cl5 and 6, which is why I ended up with a no for this voting.

I understand the dilemma. Another way of looking at it is class 5 are very common. Class 6 - 10 are not. The increased cost comes from lack of availability. Supply and demand.

Other than that well done running this in ASC RAM.

Don't be too easy on me, or I will feel I am doing something wrong!

Other than that well done running this in ASC RAM.

Don't be too easy on me, or I will feel I am doing something wrong!

I do support your ASC platform, its your politics thats just wrong. You can relax, I will most likely disagree with your future suggestions as well.

I do support increasing, but not to fond of the increased jump between cl5 and 6, which is why I ended up with a no for this voting.

I understand the dilemma. Another way of looking at it is class 5 are very common. Class 6 - 10 are not. The increased cost comes from lack of availability. Supply and demand.

That kinda just increases the issue, new players get hit by both a big jump in price and increased difficulty of finding a ship for sale at the same ship class upgrade. I dont know enough about this really, I am just guessing how it is to be a new player.

Edit: Doesnt really matter now that voting is closed, I support the decisions made by ASC, even when I disagree, as long as the prosess have been followed properly.

Class 6-10 ship base prices have been increased by 50% in the shipyards now.

Now if JAM can get average per hour player population above 50, mb we could sell some ships.